Research Proposal By Sean Cowley
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University Of Connecticut *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
History
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by AdmiralLlamaPerson223 on coursehero.com
Research Paper Proposal Format-Due Week 3
Name:
Sean Cowley
Class:
MILH360
Title:
The Forgotten Battle of Peleliu
Subject:
Battle Analysis
Thesis Statement:
With the United States Fleet being on the offense and owning the Pacific Ocean, only
the air space could be a Critical Vulnerability. This is why the Battle of Peleliu was imperative to knock
out the enemy’s aircraft capabilities and increase the presence of Allied planes.
Outline:
Main points you will discuss in your paper. Delete any portions of the outline you do not plan to
use. Paragraph 3 is the most important.
Suggested Format for Modified Battle Analysis Paper
1.
REVIEW THE SETTING (SET THE STAGE):
a.
Strategic/Operational Overview: The Japanese Operation was to be in the defensive
posture across the Islands in hopes to deny the United States access to Mainland Japan. This would be
utilized by using both aircraft and naval vessels. The United States found a new tactic they learned called
Island Hopping. This Strategic plan not only ensured the safety of the naval Vessels, but also enabled the
aircraft to be continuously on the offense enabling the initiative. This Operation conducted by the United
States Marines would be known as “Operation Stalemate II”.
b.
Compare the principal antagonists (Operational/Tactical): “United States”
(1)
size and composition:
-
1
st
Marine Division. This Division is comprised of 1
st
, 5
th
, and 7
th
Marine Regiment. They would also have
artillery assets available since 11
th
Marines were also attached for this operation. This comprised of a
total of 26,000 U.S Marines in this Battle.
(2)
technology:
- LST’s *Landing Ship Transport* were utilized to transport the Infantryman from the ship to the show
line. These ships were equipped with Machine Guns that were able to suppress the island in order to
give safety of landing. Naval Anti- Aircraft weaponry were utilized against the Japanese forces, Heavy
artillery pieces and Naval Surface Fires were utilized to suppress the island and targets of opportunity.
They also have demolition, flamethrowers, automatic rifles, and standard outfit of weaponry for an
Infantry Company.
(3)
doctrine and training:
- The 1
st
Marines were one of the most combat ready units in the Pacific after just facing the Battle for
Guadalcanal. They can be seen by being months into their operational tempo and have vast experience
when it came to combat training. The Navy have been utilizing Naval surface fires on multiple islands and
were extremely accurate in their fire in a timely manner.
(4)
leadership:
- The operation was broken down into 3 landing zones. The Ground Commander of the left known as *
White* was none other than Colonel Lewis B. Puller also known as Chesty Puller. The Ground
commander for the middle landing zone * Orange* was Colonel Harold D. Harris who went by callsign
“Bucky”. The ground commander for the right landing zone *Orange 3* was the 7
th
Marine Regiment
commander Colonel Herman H. Hanneken whose callsign was “Hardheaded”.
c.
State the mission and describe initial disposition of the opposing forces.
-
The mission for 1
st
mar was to seize Peleliu’s airfield in order to deny the enemies ability to utilize air
assets. The Island looks more like a skinny finger that has been bent. The Japanese forces were mostly
centralized in the middle in a strong point position. They utilized rock caves that were great for
protection against indirect fire assets.
-
Compare the principal antagonist (Operational/ Tactical): Japanese
1.)
Size and Composition:
-
The Japanese army was compromised of the 2
nd
Infantry Regiment reinforced. This regiment had
roughly around 10,000 soldiers outfitted with weaponry and in a defensive position.
2.) Technology:
-
They had indirect fire capabilities targeting mass concentration of troops, they had constructed
rock caves that could protect themselves while having holes to be able to engage enemy
personnel. They had aircraft capabilities and automatic weaponry.
3.)
Doctrine and Training:
- The Japanese soldier is a well spirited and disciplined troop. They are capable of being n a location with
little logistics without any complaints. They would sacrifice their life knowing that it would be for their
Country. The Japanese soldier has very little training due to their mission set of being sent directly off
towards the islands in hopes to defeat the U.S
4.) Leadership
- The Japanese tactics are different that the United States. Where we believe that a leader should be
leading from the front of the troops to create the “fighter/leader concept”, the Japanese believed in
tucking away their leader in hopes that he would be able to give orders without worry of being a
casualty. The Peleliu Sector Unit Commander was Lt. Col Kunio Nakagawa. Above him in charge is Lt.
General Sadao
2.
DESCRIBE THE ACTION:
a.
Describe the opening moves of the battle.
- The U.S conducted an amphibious assault on multiple key parts of the Island. 1
st
Marines
landed to the North on the landing point called white 1 and 2. 5
th
and 7
th
Marines focused their
landing points to the center and south. These landing points would be on the Western portion of
the Island. The initially bombardment of the Battle was from the Battleships utilizing their naval
surface fire to suppression key terrain features they believe heavy weaponry would be on.
During this bombardment, the LST’s splashed off the ships and headed to the shore. Upon
initially reaching the shore we can see that the 1
st
Marine Regiment was heavily suppressed from
their left flank. They would identify this terrain feature to be “The Point”. The Japanese forces
utilized the high elevation as an advantage point to be able to have high visibility and harder for
the allies to advance on their position.
b.
Detail the major phases/key events.
The first major phase or key event would be the seizure of the airfield taken on 16 September. This
would be only 24 hours after they initially launched their assault on the island. Having to run through the
middle of the airfield with little to no cover. The Japanese forces anticipated this and utilized their
artillery coupled with machine gun positions oriented on the airfield. The Point is another major phase
as it caused so many casualties initially. Even after the capture of the point, the Japanese did not give up
easily giving a counterattack that would last 30 hours from Nakagawa. Lastly the Bloody Hill that V 1/1
was a major phase in the battle. This was known as hill 100 commanded by Major Raymond Davis. The
key significance of the seizure of the hill was that 1
st
Battalion 1
st
Marines suffered 71% casualties during
their process.
c.
State the outcome.
-
The overall outcome of this Battle ended with the U.S seizing the island of Peleliu. With heavy
gunfire and casualties coming in at the rapid though, 1
st
marine Division, the most combat
hardened unit would be combat ineffective due to casualty loss. The total casualties of U.S
Troops was approximately 9,800. This would be broken down by 1
st
marine Division and the 81
st
Infantry Division. The airfield was a key significance for the United States due to shortening the
attack time from close air support now. With the airfield being closer to mainland Japan, this
would set the stage for air superiority for the Battle of Okinawa.
3.
ASSESS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ACTION:
a.
Relate causes to effects.
- With the new tactics of Island hoping being so new to the United States, we can see multiple logistical
problems when it came to having disperse landing zones. This can be seen by some LST’s missing the
landing points or being off by kilometers. Secondly, the Japanese utilizing their tactics of rock caves were
deadly in the aspect of providing safety for their troops and denying observation and injury from indirect
fire/ direct fire.
b.
Establish military “lessons learned.”
- The U.S learned more about the Japanese capabilities to utilize cave systems in conjunction with their
artillery assets. This would aid other units when it came to future battles. The U.S also learned that they
needed to gather more intelligence when it came to high elevation. This could be seen as nearly
impossible since the enemy was below the surface.
c.
Provide your analysis in terms of the principles, tenets, and doctrine you surveyed in the
first paper and/or as outlined above.
-
MCDP 1 “Warfighting” written by Ltcol Krulack states about the critical vulnerabilities and center
of gravity. Seeing the enemies fortified positions can be seen as a huge center of gravity. The
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help